The contact lens fit step does not look like the rest of specialist grading

What differs from the steps either side

• Shape: square boxes with 1 pt borders, tinted the same colour as the page. The EFRON cards and the chooser rows are white, with 2 pt and 1 pt borders and 12 and 10 pt corners.
• Type: option titles are 12 pt, reason titles 11 pt and Continue 12 pt. The steps around it use 15 to 16 pt labels and a 14 pt action.
• Header: a 20 pt left-aligned title with a separate back link above it. EFRON uses a centred 16 pt title with chevrons on either side, and that title row is also how you move back.
• Interaction: EFRON moves on as soon as you tap. Lens fit needs a tap and then Continue on each eye, which adds two more taps, and Continue is not at the bottom of the screen.
• Progress: the eye tabs keep showing EFRON's "6/6" during lens fit. Progress appears instead as a "1 of 2" chip that is hardcoded in English, so Dutch users also see "1 of 2".
• Selection colour: the selected judgement gets a teal border, while the selected reason gets an amber fill. EFRON shows the selection with a severity-coloured border and a "Selected" badge.
• Fit: see the measurement under each phone. When "Possible misfit" is open, Continue is pushed well below the fold.

D1. Reasons as the next step

• It extends the stepper the specialist already uses: one question at a time, the same header, and the same back chevron. Lens fit becomes one more page in that stepper, and the reasons are a page inside it.
• The header changes to "‹ Possible misfit" with the line "Right eye (OD): what suggests a possible misfit?", so the eye and the question stay visible.
• Both levels fit above the fold on the 15 Pro (see the measurements).
• Accessibility: when the reasons slide in, focus moves to the new header and VoiceOver reads "Possible misfit, choose a reason". The rows are announced as radio choices.

D2. Reasons in a sheet (chosen, 06-10-2026)

• It shows clearly that the reasons belong to "Possible misfit", which still sits dimmed underneath.
• The sheet covers the stepper header, so the eye name moves into the sheet subtitle.
• It is a modal for a choice that does not need to interrupt anything, and it adds a second way to dismiss (a swipe down or Cancel) that the rest of grading does not have.
• The sheet only just fits in the space under the video, so long Dutch labels leave little room.

Both variants

• Once a reason is recorded, the misfit row shows it ("Reason: too loose"), so going back to that eye shows the full answer.
• The eye tab badges count to 7/7. This replaces the hardcoded "1 of 2" chip.
• The button that is removed is today's "Next eye" / "Continue to decision". Tapping a row now moves on, as in EFRON. A wrong tap is undone with the back chevron or the eye tabs, and the confirm sheet shows lens fit for both eyes before sending.

Changes

• White cards with a 2 pt border, 12 pt corners, a 15 pt title and a 12 pt description, laid out like the reference cards: a 28 pt circle, then the label. A 2 by 2 grid gives a 172 pt card width, the same as an EFRON reference card.
• Selection works as on a reference card: the border takes the colour, and the circle fills with it. There is no photo for a "Selected" badge to sit on, and on a card with only text, the badge covered the title.
• The selected border is coloured by meaning: green for "Fit looks OK", amber for "Possible misfit", teal for "No lens" and "Unable to assess". This follows the soft and strong colour pairs the decision chooser already uses.
• The header uses the same pattern as the EFRON condition header. The left chevron goes back to EFRON, which replaces the separate back link. The eye name moves into the description line, which removes the hardcoded "1 of 2" chip.
• Continue is a pinned 44 pt, 14 pt footer with a specific label: "Next: left eye (OS)" or "Continue to decision".

Trade-offs

• It still needs a tap and then Continue on each eye, so the interaction stays different from EFRON.
• The pinned footer takes 57 pt of the 322 pt available. Even with nothing selected, the bottom of the second card row sits 38 pt under the footer. With misfit open, all four reasons sit below it. The footer is always reachable, but the cards above it are not.

Changes

• The header is the EFRON condition header: "‹ Contact lens fit ›". The left chevron goes back to the last EFRON condition, exactly like moving back between conditions.
• Tapping "Fit looks OK", "No lens visible" or "Unable to assess" selects it and moves on after 280 ms, as EFRON does: from the right eye to the left eye, then from the left eye to the decision chooser.
• Tapping "Possible misfit" swaps in four reason cards under the header "‹ Possible misfit ›". The left chevron there goes back to the judgements. Picking a reason moves on. Both states fit above the fold.
• The eye tab badge counts lens fit as the seventh item ("7/7"), so progress appears where the specialist already looks for it. The "1 of 2" chip goes away.

Trade-offs

• A wrong tap moves on straight away. EFRON has worked this way since launch, the chevron and the eye tabs let the specialist go back, and the confirm sheet lists lens fit for both eyes before anything is sent.
• This is more engineering work than A. The badge count changes, the post-EFRON flow changes, and the Maestro flows that tap gradingLensFitContinue need updating.

Changes

• Full-width rows with 10 pt corners. Long Dutch labels such as "Mogelijk slechte pasvorm" get the whole row width, which is the same reason the chooser switched to rows in EYOX-571.
• The same stepper header as B, and the same behaviour where a tap moves on.
• The misfit reasons open as chips (4 pt corners, at least 36 pt tall) inside the misfit row, so the judgement and its reason stay together on screen.

Trade-offs

• With misfit open, the list is taller than the space available, so two chips need a short scroll on the 15 Pro.
• It looks like the decision chooser, which is the final clinical decision. Making an observation step look like a decision can make it feel heavier than it is.